Reflections by an Eminent Chemist: Herman Mark (master) Reel 2
- 1981
These captions and transcript were generated by a computer and may contain errors. If there are significant errors that should be corrected, please let us know by emailing digital@sciencehistory.org.
Transcript
00:00:00 Kurt Meyer must have had a...
00:00:21 Stand by, this will be a recording.
00:00:29 Kurt Meyer must have had a significant impact on your scientific development.
00:00:35 Yes.
00:00:36 I think I've heard you speak of him many times,
00:00:39 and apparently an extremely talented, interested, hard-driving personality,
00:00:46 but yet someone who could understand the problems of a younger person.
00:00:55 Certainly.
00:00:56 You see, he was a pupil of Wollstetter.
00:01:00 And from Munich, on the recommendation of Wollstetter,
00:01:06 he was made, in 1923, director of a central laboratory of the IG Farben in Ludwigshafen.
00:01:14 And after he had been there for a while,
00:01:18 he realized strongly the fact that this laboratory has to be modernized.
00:01:24 It has to be adapted to the future demands of the company.
00:01:29 And that's what he told Haber, and when I met him the next day, told me.
00:01:36 He said, now we have a general, qualitative idea of what all these substances are,
00:01:44 but now we have to have those methods which you have developed here to study them quantitatively.
00:01:53 So do you want to come?
00:01:55 So I said, well, that's very interesting and challenging, no question about that.
00:01:59 And my answer is, in principle, yes, but of course I have to talk with my wife.
00:02:05 So Meyer said, I know that.
00:02:07 Whenever I do anything, I have to talk with my wife.
00:02:10 So why don't you come down with your wife and have a look at it?
00:02:13 So we went down for a few days, and on the 1st of January of 1927,
00:02:20 the family, my wife and I, we had no children yet, we moved to Mannheim, Ludwigshafen.
00:02:28 Now when I then started to work there, a new element came in, the element of practicality.
00:02:36 Until now, it was structure, it was behavior of materials, more or less from the fundamental point of view.
00:02:50 Whenever we had to make a certain substance, we made 5 grams.
00:02:55 Now, whenever we were interested in a substance, we would make 5 tons.
00:03:02 Which means that it was now a very much larger group.
00:03:08 In fact, it was a group which spanned from organic chemistry right into physics
00:03:15 and from preparation of new monomers over the polymerization reactions
00:03:26 and know-how into the purification and into the preparation of a fiber or of a film
00:03:34 and into the quantitative testing.
00:03:38 At that time, it was probably one of the largest corporate labs in the world.
00:03:42 Yes.
00:03:44 It sounds like the DuPont lab in the late 20s and early 30s, or maybe ICI,
00:03:52 but certainly it must have been one of the largest corporate laboratory structures studying polymers.
00:03:58 Probably the largest.
00:03:59 Yes.
00:04:00 There were others in the IG farm.
00:04:02 One was at the Höchst, that was on dyestuffs.
00:04:09 And one was in Leverkusen at Bayer, that was on pharmaceuticals.
00:04:15 So they concentrated their research on pharmaceuticals, Höchst on dyestuffs, and we on polymers.
00:04:26 There were some 65 people, and of course when we had to do something on a larger scale,
00:04:31 we had a technicum with kettles and with stills and with high-pressure or medium-pressure equipment.
00:04:38 And, well, what was done there, on top of refining the original Staudinger principle,
00:04:45 because our position, or my position and Mayer's position was, of course those were chains.
00:04:51 I mean, Staudinger has discovered and established the fact that all these materials are long chains.
00:04:58 First question is, how long are they really?
00:05:01 Second question is, what are their properties?
00:05:05 Are they stiff? Are they flexible?
00:05:07 Have they certain preferred conformations?
00:05:10 Have they certain preferred reactivities?
00:05:13 In other words, all the details had to be added.
00:05:16 As I remember, you wrote your first book, an X-ray diffraction, before you went to Ludwig Sabin.
00:05:28 This book was published in 1926, and I presume that its appearance to a certain extent
00:05:34 was responsible for the fact that Kurt Mayer wanted me to come to Ludwig Sabin.
00:05:38 Well, what made me think of it is I know you wrote several books with Kurt Mayer also.
00:05:42 Yes, later.
00:05:43 At a later stage.
00:05:44 Yes, 1930.
00:05:45 When did the call then come from the University of Vienna?
00:05:50 Well, then in 1932, early in 1932, Hitler was made Chancellor of Germany.
00:06:02 And one saw already that the general direction in which things would move.
00:06:09 And the director of our whole plant is Dr. Gauss.
00:06:17 One day he called me and said, look here, you are a foreigner.
00:06:23 Mayer is a foreigner.
00:06:25 You are of Jewish ancestry.
00:06:27 He is of Jewish ancestry.
00:06:29 I think it is best if you both see to it that you get some other jobs, academic jobs.
00:06:39 So Mayer went to Geneva, I went to Vienna.
00:06:42 And in my case, Dr. Gauss very much assisted this move by retaining me as a consultant
00:06:54 for the IG Farben Laboratory with a very substantial amount of money.
00:06:59 Mayer didn't need that.
00:07:00 He was a rich man anyway.
00:07:02 How did Mimi feel about all of this?
00:07:06 I always had the feeling that Ludwig Sabin was not her favorite place.
00:07:10 No.
00:07:11 She would probably like to go back to Vienna.
00:07:13 Yes.
00:07:14 Well, our two boys were born in Mannheim.
00:07:17 So there was a certain attachment to Mannheim.
00:07:20 But of course she was very happy to go back to Vienna because of her parents.
00:07:24 They were getting old, my parents getting old.
00:07:28 So we were glad that we had an opportunity to go to Vienna.
00:07:34 Well, then when I came to Vienna, another new element had to be added, and that was teaching.
00:07:44 Of course, there was no teaching in the polymer field at all.
00:07:48 If you take the famous books of organic chemistry of these days, like Carrer and like Hollemann,
00:08:00 maybe there was a page on cellulose.
00:08:02 Probably there was nothing on rubber at all except the word somewhere.
00:08:08 Maybe there was a page on proteins.
00:08:10 But that was all.
00:08:11 First of all, they were considered to be absolutely different disciplines.
00:08:15 And then they were more or less ignored for a chemist.
00:08:19 I mean, they were very important for engineers.
00:08:22 Well, I don't want to sound defensive, but you can take 50 percent of the standard organic texts
00:08:31 which are now written in the United States, and there's not more than one page on high polymer.
00:08:37 Yeah, you're right.
00:08:38 So while that sounds a bit harsh on my part, it's essentially true.
00:08:45 It's true.
00:08:47 Now then, of course, as you know, how this was teaching at the university,
00:08:50 it has to be integrated into the entire plan.
00:08:54 In other words, the other professors have to agree, the faculty has to agree.
00:08:59 And it took some time, you see, until, let's say, my colleague of organic chemistry,
00:09:06 Professor Speight, a very famous organic chemist, and others, until they agreed.
00:09:15 And what they really told me is this.
00:09:17 I told them what I would like to do.
00:09:19 I would like to start giving a five-hour course a week on fundamentals of polymer chemistry.
00:09:32 Kind of a general lecture.
00:09:34 And they said, well, if you want to do that on top of all the other things which you have to do, we don't care.
00:09:41 But certainly this could not be done at the expenses of the rest of our educational program.
00:09:50 All right, fine.
00:09:52 So what I did then, I assembled a large number of young people.
00:09:57 Some of them came from Germany.
00:09:59 Others came from other places.
00:10:02 And with the aid of them, you see, we organized such a course.
00:10:06 One of them gave the synthesis of monomers.
00:10:08 The other one gave polymerization kinetics.
00:10:10 The other one gave viscosity measurements and so on and so on.
00:10:15 So that really after three years, that means in 1935, there was a solid background of polymer teaching established.
00:10:31 And as far as the search went, again, it was obvious that under the same roof must be the man who makes a new polymer.
00:10:44 A man who handles it, spins it, casts it.
00:10:51 A man who establishes its molecular weight, molecular weight distribution.
00:10:56 The man who eventually makes physical tests.
00:10:59 In other words, it doesn't work to buy a polyethylene from a certain company and then spend a year on characterizing it to the last possible degree
00:11:14 because after a year, the company doesn't make this polyethylene anymore.
00:11:18 Well, today it's obvious.
00:11:22 That's what everybody does today.
00:11:25 But at that time, it had to be tried out whether it can be done.
00:11:31 One of the things that I've always admired about you is that decision that you had to make.
00:11:39 You didn't have to make and yet you had to make to get out and get out fast.
00:11:44 That was 37, wasn't it?
00:11:46 38.
00:11:47 38.
00:11:48 To take all of the things you'd worked for and you can always, and many people did unfortunately, talk themselves into not believing.
00:12:00 I've always admired you for that decision to get out and get out fast.
00:12:04 And I know it wasn't easy.
00:12:06 But you see, I had the great advantage that I had been in Germany.
00:12:10 I was in Germany for ten years, from 22 to 32.
00:12:16 And I had seen how that comes up and how that works.
00:12:21 And as soon as I saw that Austria would be in the same situation, in the same quadrant, I just left.
00:12:28 Now, I had a big advantage that I had an offer from Canada, from the Canadian International Paper Company.
00:12:35 The director, a Norwegian, he visited Europe quite frequently.
00:12:43 In 1937, he also visited my institute because he knew that we were working on cellulose.
00:12:49 And he told me, look here, we have a big research laboratory.
00:12:53 We call it research laboratory in Hawkesbury in Canada.
00:12:57 But now that I travel through Europe, I see that our laboratory is obsolete.
00:13:04 We would like to have somebody to come over, take that laboratory and modernize it.
00:13:09 So I said, well, for the time being, I can't get away so fast.
00:13:13 But one year later, I got away very fast.
00:13:17 And then I went to Canada with the family to Hawkesbury.
00:13:23 Big paper company, pulp and paper company.
00:13:27 A company which made most of the pulp which was used by the DuPont Company.
00:13:37 And the DuPont Company needed several types of pulp.
00:13:40 They needed one for cellulose acetate.
00:13:43 They needed one for tire cord.
00:13:46 And they needed one for standard rayon.
00:13:49 And we had to cook up these different pulps together with the DuPont paper.
00:13:57 Before we leave the University of Vienna, you, of course, had a number of students
00:14:02 who later became well-known in their own right.
00:14:07 Who would you classify in that group?
00:14:11 Well, there was Dr. Patat, Eirich, Simha, Süss, Vacek, Gross, Guth, and a few others.
00:14:29 That's an imposing list.
00:14:31 It's an imposing list of students that you trained and made their own impact.
00:14:38 Most of them in the States.
00:14:40 Many of them in the States.
00:14:41 Most of them eventually emigrated.
00:14:45 So then you stopped in England on your way over...
00:14:48 Kratki. I forgot Kratki.
00:14:50 Kratki.
00:14:53 Low angle x-ray scanner.
00:14:57 Even a good old organic chemist like me...
00:14:59 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:15:02 You didn't stay in England.
00:15:03 Parents. I forgot parents.
00:15:04 Parents?
00:15:05 Yeah, sure.
00:15:08 He was not only low angle x-ray, he got the Nobel Prize.
00:15:13 How long did you stay in England before you got to Huxbury?
00:15:16 A few months.
00:15:17 A few months.
00:15:21 Of course, those delightful Canadian winters were exhilarating.
00:15:26 Educational, yes.
00:15:30 That must have been quite a change to go to Huxbury,
00:15:36 and yet you didn't lose your enthusiasm and interest,
00:15:40 and their interaction with the DuPont Company soon had you in interaction with the DuPont Company.
00:15:45 Yes.
00:15:46 It all came about like this, that one of the directors of DuPont,
00:15:57 William F. Zimmerly...
00:15:59 I knew him, yeah.
00:16:01 He was on the board of the Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn,
00:16:08 and Dr. Benger, the director of the research division of the family department,
00:16:17 he came up to Canada quite a few times to discuss problems.
00:16:27 Then some day, they probably went to Dr. Rogers
00:16:34 and told him, look here, we have the feeling that this fellow would like to come to the States.
00:16:41 Why don't you offer him at least an adjunct professorship?
00:16:46 So with Dr. Kirk and Dr. Rogers, they did that at the instigation
00:16:53 or maybe at the suggestion of the DuPont people.
00:16:58 Now, up in Huxbury, of course, my director wasn't very happy about it,
00:17:03 but he couldn't say very much because DuPont was his best customer,
00:17:07 so he didn't want to antagonize DuPont.
00:17:09 He got a very good successor from me anyhow.
00:17:13 Then in 1940, I came down to Brooklyn.
00:17:18 Well, that's another period of your life that I have great admiration for you
00:17:23 because while the spirit was there, the Ph.D. program was there,
00:17:29 the facilities were other than magnificent.
00:17:33 It didn't bother you at all.
00:17:35 You simply waited in.
00:17:38 It is to, I think, Harry Rogers and Ray Kirk's everlasting credit to go ahead
00:17:46 because their backgrounds and personalities and traditional education in the States
00:17:55 were completely different than yours,
00:17:57 and yet they had enough vision to understand that this was the way the Polytechnic could go.
00:18:03 And as I look back on that, that was a great thing.
00:18:10 Of course, then I know some of the chapter, having participated in it since 1947.
00:18:22 You might mention a few things about the war years
00:18:25 and that interim period where there were no regular students to speak of,
00:18:36 or at least not very many.
00:18:43 There were students that came, an onrush of students then, about 1946.
00:18:51 I don't know if you want to say anything about those early days at the Polytechnic
00:18:59 in that interim period before we had the growth of the Institute exponentially right after the war.
00:19:10 Well, you see, the great advantage for me was that the word polymer was unknown in the United States.
00:19:18 The only man who had worked on, well, there were two people who had worked on polymers.
00:19:23 One was Carothers in an industrial laboratory who published wonderful papers which nobody read,
00:19:31 and the other one was Speed Marble in an organic chemical department at the University of Illinois
00:19:36 who published wonderful papers which nobody read.
00:19:39 So there was a chance to use them both or cooperate with them both as much as possible.
00:19:47 With Carothers, you couldn't cooperate anymore because he was dead.
00:19:52 And then what my feeling was that one would have to set up some kind of literature in the field
00:20:00 because if a field is supposed to develop, it can only develop on the basis of books
00:20:06 and eventually of journals.
00:20:09 That's the reason why Proskauer and Decker and I, we published the Carothers book first.
00:20:15 First of all, just to have a firm background.
00:20:19 And then Marbury joined this group, and from then on we started to publish these various books.
00:20:28 So it was really an additional element was now literature.
00:20:36 And then, as you pointed out, during the war things were very irregular.
00:20:42 I still remember we had kind of crazy assignments for the army, the weasel and the habercook and the duck.
00:20:55 Those were the days when General Alfred first appeared at the institute and made his impact
00:21:01 as being completely in the fatigue and doing everything excellently and fast.
00:21:10 And then you came, and so we had the organic ant in our hands.
00:21:19 And you came from MIT, where you just had repeated as the first human being,
00:21:25 the old synthesis of cyclooctatetraene, and meanwhile Reppi had made it in Germany.
00:21:31 And then you repeated the Reppi synthesis, I think, in the shaft of an elevator.
00:21:37 That's correct.
00:21:38 At the bottom of a shaft of an elevator.
00:21:41 And the reason was that there was always a certain probability it would blow up.
00:21:46 So we said, well, if it blows up in the shaft of an elevator not used anymore, at least that's it.
00:21:52 But anyway, you got it, you see.
00:21:54 And then Frank Huchen and I, we determined the structure.
00:21:58 As a matter of fact, that was an interesting aspect of things,
00:22:03 because the control room for that bomb and so on was partially outdoors
00:22:09 and was a lavatory that was outdoors.
00:22:15 And we had all these controls on it.
00:22:21 Well, before we leave also, I've often thought to myself,
00:22:31 is it just your own individual idea that there are certain periods of time in science,
00:22:40 not necessarily one discipline alone, that are more exciting than others?
00:22:48 And it's easy to fall into the trap of personalizing.
00:22:55 But I can't help think that that period, in Germany particularly,
00:23:04 from 1920 to 1938-40, if you look at all chemistry and physics,
00:23:18 there was an enormous number of things which emerged.
00:23:22 Not just the polymer alone, but there were an enormous number of things.
00:23:27 Quantum mechanics emerged at that time.
00:23:30 Really, quantum mechanics emerged, polymers emerged, and semiconductors emerged at that time.
00:23:36 Those were the three fundamental things.
00:23:40 And of course, a lot of biochemistry.
00:23:42 I mean, the enzyme work of Wilstetter and the hormone work of Wieland and of Hans Fischer.
00:23:48 That was really the background of all the things which go on now in the biofields.
00:23:55 What would you like to say then about the Palmer Research Institute
00:24:02 at the Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn as you established it
00:24:07 and as it grew from 1946 particularly?
00:24:11 Well, as I said, I think one element to be added to research and teaching was literature.
00:24:20 Yes.
00:24:21 And with the good help of Decker and most of all of Proskauer, that was done.
00:24:27 And they really risked their necks.
00:24:31 Because when they started this series, they had no money.
00:24:35 When they started the journal, they had even less money.
00:24:38 And they just did it.
00:24:40 And you remember how we sweated out the first volumes of the journal.
00:24:43 We never had enough papers.
00:24:45 And now it's the other way around.
00:24:47 It's polymerized.
00:24:49 And then, you see, of course, then it was felt, I think, Kirk said that first,
00:24:57 well, why don't we give a name to what we have anyway?
00:25:03 Namely, a polymer research institute.
00:25:05 And that was, so to speak, the official, the day when the name was made official
00:25:10 and came under the stationery.
00:25:15 And then I felt, after the war, the next important step for me
00:25:22 and for all my collaborators would be international connections.
00:25:28 And such an institute, if it remains restricted to the United States and Brooklyn, would die.
00:25:37 So let's go out, use all our international connections and see.
00:25:43 And that was then the beginning really of EUPAC.
00:25:48 And all the beginning of, and you went to Amsterdam, where I don't know,
00:25:57 and Mays went to Groningen, and Turner went to Liege, and Tobolsk.
00:26:08 So we had half a dozen of spies all over the world.
00:26:13 Imogud went to Sweden.
00:26:16 And that paid off tremendously.
00:26:20 I agree with you.
00:26:21 That paid off tremendously.
00:26:23 The contacts which you set up and then the younger people did were just tremendous.
00:26:28 Yeah, and then the others came, no?
00:26:30 They came and they cooked.
00:26:32 And Kaczalski, both Kaczalskis came.
00:26:35 And almost everybody came and stayed a while at the institute and then went back again.
00:26:41 And now we have a dense cross-linked network all over the world.
00:26:49 And then you see when we are now in the 60s or so,
00:26:53 the best proof of the pudding is to eat it.
00:27:01 And the best proof of the usefulness of our institute in Brooklyn
00:27:07 was that so many other universities did the same thing.
00:27:12 We certainly triggered some much more interest in academic life.
00:27:19 And those people who left Brooklyn, like you, they started it.
00:27:23 Orlando, he started it in Cleveland.
00:27:25 Well, he didn't really start it, but Stein, he started it,
00:27:29 or at least laid the foundation in Amherst.
00:27:33 If I must personalize for a moment,
00:27:35 I can remember when I obtained the offer to be an assistant professor
00:27:40 at the Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn.
00:27:42 And, of course, I called up Speed Marvel and said,
00:27:47 What do you think?
00:27:50 And he said in characteristic fashion,
00:27:52 Do you want to do research in polymers?
00:27:55 I said, Yes.
00:27:56 And he said, You better take it.
00:28:01 Which was a straightforward common sense.
00:28:05 Because I doubt if I could have done it in the same way anyplace else.
00:28:11 Of course, the other thing which, to me, will always be there,
00:28:17 the excitement of a period there,
00:28:22 when we had all of these young people around, and you,
00:28:26 not that you weren't young, don't misunderstand me,
00:28:29 but it was tremendous.
00:28:31 My own scientific life was kind of molded in 20 years of research there.
00:28:37 It was a free and easy exchange of ideas.
00:28:40 It was a wonderful time.
00:28:43 And it wouldn't have been possible if it hadn't been for
00:28:48 your own interest, personality, and driving force.
00:28:52 And Kirk.
00:28:53 And Kirk.
00:28:54 Well, Rogers didn't live very long, but Kirk.
00:28:58 He integrated it, and he did it in a nice way.
00:29:02 Yeah, Kirk was absolutely unique.
00:29:07 If necessary, he was very firm,
00:29:10 but he had an excellent understanding for starting off new things.
00:29:17 Now, maybe we are nearing the end of our conversation.
00:29:23 Let's talk about what should our institute do next.
00:29:28 I mean, where should they move next?
00:29:33 Now, with Eli Pierce, and with Dona Ruma,
00:29:37 and with Bernie Balkin, with Eirich and Moravec,
00:29:42 and thanks God we have now six very good young professors.
00:29:47 Organic chemists, x-ray, laser chemistry, everything.
00:29:51 And if we get Keller and Atkins, we are really a very powerful group.
00:29:58 Well, there is no question that there has been a resurgence of activity again.
00:30:02 Yes, yes.
00:30:04 And an understanding from the administration there that
00:30:09 they almost lost something, and they better work at it to
00:30:13 retain what they have and improve it.
00:30:15 And I, of course, can't emphasize that that's the way the institute must go.
00:30:24 Now, you see, some institutes are strongly inclined to move into the bio field,
00:30:32 biopolymers and everything, bioengineering and such things.
00:30:38 This is nothing for us.
00:30:40 I mean, all the people that are doing that, they do it very well.
00:30:43 What I think we should do is to refine methods for the detailed characterization
00:30:52 of polymeric materials, such as fluorescence.
00:30:58 The method exists, but it can be tremendously refined
00:31:04 with relatively little expenses.
00:31:09 All you have to know is how to make a polymer
00:31:13 which has these fluorescent or quenching units in a certain place.
00:31:19 In other words, again, you need a man who can make a polymer
00:31:22 absolutely according to specification.
00:31:26 And then have an improved, have a short-time equipment
00:31:33 like George Porter has at the Royal Institution.
00:31:38 This doesn't cost very much.
00:31:40 I think this is one area.
00:31:45 In other words, I think we should carry on refinements of existing methods
00:31:52 for the characterization of polymeric materials.
00:31:55 Well, it is certainly an important aspect.
00:31:59 And we can do that.
00:32:01 It doesn't cost too much.
00:32:03 It doesn't cost too much.
00:32:06 Of course, the Institute has always had a reputation
00:32:10 of developing new instrumental methods.
00:32:13 Yeah, with light scattering.
00:32:15 This is another area that you have always been interested in and pushed.
00:32:21 Well, I want to thank you very much for taking the time and trouble
00:32:25 to discuss the history of polymer chemistry,
00:32:30 which is the history of Herman Mark.
00:32:34 And it's a pleasure to have this opportunity to chat with you
00:32:39 and get this recorded for posterity for the American Chemical Society.
00:32:47 And I, as always, Herman, wish you the very best.
00:32:51 Well, I thank you very much.
00:32:53 It wasn't trouble for me at all.
00:32:55 It was a real great pleasure.
00:32:57 And I thank you, and I thank the American Chemical Society.