About Magazine Podcasts Events
Museum Hours:Wednesday–Saturday, 10AM–5PM

Digital Collections

Business correspondence

Progress Report on glass electrodes

  • Appraisal of competitors electrodes

  • 1954-Apr-15

Rights

In Copyright

Download all 2 images

PDFZIPof full-sized JPGs

Download selected image

Small JPG1200 x 1522px — 278 KBFull-sized JPG2786 x 3534px — 1.3 MBOriginal fileTIFF — 2786 x 3534px — 28.2 MB
View
In
Copyright
PDF
Download PDF
ZIP
of full-sized JPGs
Download ZIP

The report concerns Beckman's electrode business, with a focus on Leeds & Northrup electrodes which "do not compare too favorably with ours."

Property Value
Author
Format
Genre
Extent
  • 8.5 in. W x 11 in. L
Language
Subject
Rights In Copyright
Rights holder
  • Danaher Corporation
Credit line
  • Courtesy of Science History Institute

Institutional location

Department
Collection
Series arrangement
  • Sub-series 3. Product Files
  • Series II. Business Activities Files
Physical container
  • Box 19, Folder 16

View in library catalog

Related Items

Cite as

Arthur, Edwin P. “Progress Report on Glass Electrodes,” April 15, 1954. Beckman Historical Collection, Box 19, Folder 16. Science History Institute. Philadelphia. https://digital.sciencehistory.org/works/6m311q23q.

  Export citation (RIS) ?

This citation is automatically generated and may contain errors.

Rights

In Copyright

Download selected image

Small JPG1200 x 1530px — 377 KBFull-sized JPG2786 x 3551px — 1.6 MBOriginal fileTIFF — 2786 x 3551px — 28.4 MB

The Science History Institute recognizes there are materials in our collections that may be offensive or harmful, containing racist, sexist, Eurocentric, ableist, or homophobic language or depictions. The history of science is not exempt from beliefs or practices harmful to traditionally marginalized groups. The Institute is engaged in ongoing efforts to responsibly present and address the evidence of oppression and injustice inextricable from the history of science. If you would like to learn more about our ongoing efforts or if you encounter harmful, inaccurate, or insufficient descriptions, please contact us at digital@sciencehistory.org.