About Magazine Podcasts Events
Museum Hours

Digital Collections

Business correspondence

Letter from John T. Edsall to Max Perutz, February 25, 1965

  • 1965-Feb-25

Rights

In Copyright

Download all 2 images

PDFZIPof full-sized JPGs

Download selected image

Small JPG1200 x 1562px — 386 KBLarge JPG2880 x 3749px — 2.3 MBFull-sized JPG5335 x 6945px — 7.1 MBOriginal fileTIFF — 5335 x 6945px — 106 MB
View
In
Copyright
Searchable PDF
may contain errors
Download PDF
ZIP
of full-sized JPGs
Download ZIP
Addressee
Author
Place of creation
Format
Genre
Extent
  • 2 pages
Language
Subject
Rights In Copyright
Credit line
  • Courtesy of Science History Institute

Institutional location

Department
Collection
Series arrangement
  • Series XI: Max Perutz papers, 1909-2000
  • Sub-series 2: Correspondence, 1938-2000
Physical container
  • Box 74, Folder 12

View collection guide View in library catalog

Related Items

Cite as

Edsall, John T. (John Tileston). “Letter from John T. Edsall to Max Perutz, February 25, 1965,” February 25, 1965. History of Molecular Biology Collection, Box 74, Folder 12. Science History Institute. Philadelphia. https://digital.sciencehistory.org/works/l7jj26q.

  Export citation (RIS) ?

This citation is automatically generated and may contain errors.

Rights

In Copyright

Download selected image

Small JPG1200 x 1537px — 372 KBLarge JPG2880 x 3689px — 2.4 MBFull-sized JPG5324 x 6819px — 7.1 MBOriginal fileTIFF — 5324 x 6819px — 104 MB

The Science History Institute recognizes there are materials in our collections that may be offensive or harmful, containing racist, sexist, Eurocentric, ableist, or homophobic language or depictions. The history of science is not exempt from beliefs or practices harmful to traditionally marginalized groups. The Institute is engaged in ongoing efforts to responsibly present and address the evidence of oppression and injustice inextricable from the history of science. If you would like to learn more about our ongoing efforts or if you encounter harmful, inaccurate, or insufficient descriptions, please contact us at digital@sciencehistory.org.