About Magazine Podcasts Events
Museum Hours:Wednesday–Saturday, 10AM–5PM

Digital Collections

Business correspondence

Letter from T. Roberts Baker to James Curtis Booth, September 28, 1850

  • 1850-Sep-28

Rights

Public Domain

Download all 2 images

PDFZIPof full-sized JPGs

Download selected image

Small JPG1200 x 1486px — 251 KBLarge JPG2880 x 3567px — 1.3 MBFull-sized JPG3272 x 4052px — 1.6 MBOriginal fileTIFF — 3272 x 4052px — 38.0 MB
View
Public
Domain
PDF
Download PDF
ZIP
of full-sized JPGs
Download ZIP

T. Roberts Baker wishes to study chemistry under the tutelage of James Curtis Booth (1810-1888).

Property Value
Addressee
Author
Place of creation
Format
Genre
Extent
  • 20.3 cm W x 25 cm H
Language
Subject
Rights Public Domain Mark 1.0
Credit line
  • Courtesy of Science History Institute

Institutional location

Department
Collection
Physical container
  • Box 1, Folder 6

View in library catalog

Related Items

Cite as

Baker, T. Roberts. “Letter from T. Roberts Baker to James Curtis Booth, September 28, 1850,” September 28, 1850. Papers of James Curtis Booth, Box 1, Folder 6. Science History Institute. Philadelphia. https://digital.sciencehistory.org/works/lu2qixa.

  Export citation (RIS) ?

This citation is automatically generated and may contain errors.

Rights

Public Domain

Download selected image

Small JPG1200 x 1500px — 214 KBLarge JPG2880 x 3601px — 1.3 MBFull-sized JPG3272 x 4091px — 1.6 MBOriginal fileTIFF — 3272 x 4091px — 38.4 MB

The Science History Institute recognizes there are materials in our collections that may be offensive or harmful, containing racist, sexist, Eurocentric, ableist, or homophobic language or depictions. The history of science is not exempt from beliefs or practices harmful to traditionally marginalized groups. The Institute is engaged in ongoing efforts to responsibly present and address the evidence of oppression and injustice inextricable from the history of science. If you would like to learn more about our ongoing efforts or if you encounter harmful, inaccurate, or insufficient descriptions, please contact us at digital@sciencehistory.org.